I just read this. If these guys received 18 and 21 months respectively,and they testified against Vick, it stands to reason, Vick should get more, right? I see possibly 2 years now.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/..._co_defendants
I just read this. If these guys received 18 and 21 months respectively,and they testified against Vick, it stands to reason, Vick should get more, right? I see possibly 2 years now.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071130/..._co_defendants
Bookmarks